<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Business Fear Mongering &#8211; &#8220;But what if everyone uses that&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://experiencecurve.com/archives/business-fear-mongering-but-what-if-everyone-uses-that/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/business-fear-mongering-but-what-if-everyone-uses-that</link>
	<description>Learning and writing about emerging internet culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:06:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: karl long</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/business-fear-mongering-but-what-if-everyone-uses-that/comment-page-1#comment-72</link>
		<dc:creator>karl long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:35:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=90#comment-72</guid>
		<description>Too true, that&#039;s why i liked flickr as an example, i mean they charged from the begining, and their value proposition was such a slam dunk I signed up the next day. None of the trying to squeek by on a free account. It was $50 bucks a year at first (if memory serves), but for that you got 2 gig&#039;s of upload bandwidth every month, i&#039;m not a math genius but I quickly figured out that was 24 gigs a year, no brainer. Of course I barely use 2% of that on a monthly basis :-)

From a business model standpoint, and this is an often overlooked fact, they bucked the trend of charging for storage, I mean even two years ago if you were basing your business model and pricing on the cost of storage it was like tying your priceing to a falling rock. Flickr was very innnovative by tying their pricing to bandwidth, guess what, it&#039;s still 2gig&#039;s upload a month and they&#039;ve halved the price. Anway, an inovative product combined with an innovative business model was flickr&#039;s success. Everyone else was charging for 100megs of storage and trying to make money of prints. 

Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too true, that&#8217;s why i liked flickr as an example, i mean they charged from the begining, and their value proposition was such a slam dunk I signed up the next day. None of the trying to squeek by on a free account. It was $50 bucks a year at first (if memory serves), but for that you got 2 gig&#8217;s of upload bandwidth every month, i&#8217;m not a math genius but I quickly figured out that was 24 gigs a year, no brainer. Of course I barely use 2% of that on a monthly basis <img src='http://experiencecurve.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>From a business model standpoint, and this is an often overlooked fact, they bucked the trend of charging for storage, I mean even two years ago if you were basing your business model and pricing on the cost of storage it was like tying your priceing to a falling rock. Flickr was very innnovative by tying their pricing to bandwidth, guess what, it&#8217;s still 2gig&#8217;s upload a month and they&#8217;ve halved the price. Anway, an inovative product combined with an innovative business model was flickr&#8217;s success. Everyone else was charging for 100megs of storage and trying to make money of prints. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Levi Cooperman</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/business-fear-mongering-but-what-if-everyone-uses-that/comment-page-1#comment-71</link>
		<dc:creator>Levi Cooperman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2006 21:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=90#comment-71</guid>
		<description>What about another important question: &quot;If everyone uses it, how will that make me money?&quot;.  This is a question too few web 2.0 businesses are asking before they put together a great new service that attracts thousands of users.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about another important question: &#8220;If everyone uses it, how will that make me money?&#8221;.  This is a question too few web 2.0 businesses are asking before they put together a great new service that attracts thousands of users.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Futurelab's Blog</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/business-fear-mongering-but-what-if-everyone-uses-that/comment-page-1#comment-70</link>
		<dc:creator>Futurelab's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=90#comment-70</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Business Fear Mongering - â€œBut what if everyone uses thatâ€...&lt;/strong&gt;

by: Karl Long Many conversations about interactive products and services come to the point of asking the question &ldquo;but what if everyone uses that&rdquo;, ususally reffering to the &ldquo;free&rdquo; aspect of a service, or the general priceing, o...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Business Fear Mongering &#8211; â€œBut what if everyone uses thatâ€&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>by: Karl Long Many conversations about interactive products and services come to the point of asking the question &#38;ldquo;but what if everyone uses that&#38;rdquo;, ususally reffering to the &#38;ldquo;free&#38;rdquo; aspect of a service, or the general priceing, o&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
