Archive for the 'Viral-Persuasion' Category

Beyond Viral: 3 ideas for Co-Creative Marketing

So this is some early experimental thinking here so feel free to poke holes, call bullshit, or add your own take in the comments.

I’m using the term co-creative marketing here as I think it’s a better more holistic term than “viral”. I still think viral is a totally valid tactic, but I don’t think it’s a strategy. Viral in most cases is not much better than a 30 second spot except it’s distribution is cheaper, I guess that’s why marketers and advertisers are so generally comfortable with the concept.

For me the concept of co-creative marketing is something that should, at it’s best, be built into the DNA of your products and services. Something that builds tremendous value for you over time, something that ends up building “social equity“.

My working definition of social equity for the moment is: “social equity is built by aggregating, connecting, reflecting and amplifying the all the small user contributions over time so the whole is worth much more than the sum of its parts.” Sort of like network effects, the more people using it and participating the more valuable your product or service.

Anyway, I was thinking about what the necessary components were for co-creative marketing and came up with Shareable, Mashable, and Hackable which i’ll elaborate on a bit here. I think I have a much better idea of what makes something sharable and some nascent ideas on mashable and hackable.

Shareable

Shareable may seem self explanatory, but sometimes it takes effort to create elements of your product or service that are shareable. Easy to share, right size, right format, WORTH SHARING. YouTube is probably the poster child of “shareble” content with their embedable video player, that is what made their business.

Once you have content or items worth sharing it’s important to measure and track how people are using and sharing it. Measurement can help you track where things start, who are the influencers, and what the response is.

Of course the big rhino in the room is why would someone want to share your stuff with other people. Most companies seem to think putting an “email to a friend” link on their mundane web site is enough to get people frothing at the mouth to tell their friends. Unfortunately that is not enough, the act of sharing something requires not only effort but generally involves someone putting their reputation on the line. If someone is sharing something of yours be it a video, image, coupon etc. they are endorsing you and you had better make them look good.

You might even try and cultivate sharers and influencers, some people like to be firestarters, they like to be the first to know, and they like to be the first to tell their friends about it. Take a look at Jeremiah’s concept of early adopters/influencers or David Armano’s Influence Rippples Diagram for more on this.

Ripples 2 2

One thing I wonder about this is how much more shareble are real world products, or at least information about real world products will become as the mobile evernet becomes more pervasive? Think how text message short codes could be used on real world products, or on environmental media.

Mashable

Mashable means can someone build something new and interesting information you provide? Is there any base of machine readable structured data that you can give access to your customers, programmers, kids with too much time on their hands? RSS, XML, or even proper API’s. Think google maps, craigs list, RSS feeds, Geocoded information etc.

Texasholdem 01Think about what information is created just through the use of your product or service, and how can that make your product more attractive. A brilliant example of this comes from Facebook, when you see the underlying data of how your friends are using certain applications or games, you can see how much more attractive these products become. Take the Texas Holdem application for instance which has presence information, leader-board information etc.

Hackable

Hacking of course has some pretty scary connotations, but hackability is essentially the secret behind a lot of the buzz created by products like the Roomba, Lego Mind Storms, and maybe even Harley Davidsons and Mini Coopers. How can customers make your product their own which can be as simple as customization, and how can they make it do things that you didn’t even intend :-)

So how can you make it hackable? distribute source code, create api’s, create easter eggs, create competitions, put frameworks in place. Even some of these consumer generated commercials where a company might provide different video assets and soundtracks to enable customers to create their own commercials is hackability in a way. putting a framework in place for people to be creative.

These are just some rough ideas of what can contribute to the co-creative marketing of a product. I have one more aspect which I have not quite figured out where it fits and how to describe it, but it’s at the heart of what makes products and services co-creative. It’s where customers contribute to the primary value of a product or service, think ebay, threadless, yelp, flickr, Etsy, ThisNext, Delicious. They all have aspects that are shareable, mashable, and hackable, but the primary value they create is co-creative. So what is that? Contributable? Crowdsourced?

Crackbook - Facebook Parody

crackbook

A writer promoting his book “the internet, now in handy book form” created a wonderful parody of Facebook, a potentially brilliant example of viral marketing seems to be dead on target. Although it is possible that people that find this the funniest are unlikely to be interested in a book that on the surface might be targeted to the internet newb. But then are they the ones that are going to spread it further? Boy, viral targeting is a conundrum.

ODG - Original Design Gangsta

Great little bit of self promotion via youtube for Kyle T Watkins, graphic designer, illustrator and ODG. A great example of a viral video on a small budget but with a clear business aim. Interestingly it seems that Kyle has started a little side business selling the mp3 of the song for 99c and selling some t-shirts via cafepress.

It’s interesting as well that graphic designers are famous for creating little self promotional tools to show off their creative chops and attract the attention of potential customers. For some great examples I highly recomend this book called “A Smile in the Mind: Witty Thinking in Graphic Design “, it’s a brilliant coffee table book.

Niche Marketing Is The Key To Viral Marketing

Bobby Hendersons post explaining his Fine Art Taco experiment should be required reading for all marketing, advertising, business people, and bloggers.

taco experiment

Essentially Bobby put up a site with some badly lit pictures of taco’s and claimed the site was targeted at a specific demographic, people that liked both fine art and tacos. He demonstrated this demographic with a very nice example of a Venn diagram, showing the critical intersection.

niche market

Today BoingBoing linked to him proving his point of course, clearly there are enough people to buy his weakly framed and badly lit taco photos to keep him in beers for a while.

But of course no one is really interested in his photographs or the tacos, they are really interested wonderfully predictive nature of his experiment. His venn diagram and blog post are almost the queen of hearts a magician will remove from a sealed envelope after guessing the card.

But his point about niches is important, tight niches are what enable something to go viral, they provide the kindling to get something going. They are not the fuel, that’s the sites like boing boing, tech crunch, digg, the mainstream media. Think about it, it really doesn’t require much more that 40 people to digg something until the rest of the site gets on it, so intially you just have to get 40 or 50 people excited enough about it to get on the front page of digg.

One case study in not being too niche, if you will forgive the self reference, is my t-shirt blog, tcritic.com which I started about a year ago. A lot of people thought it was too niche, a lot of people wondered if I would be able to find enough to write about. Well a year later that site has been on BoingBoing (indirectly) and on the front page of digg. After 1 day on boingboing I had picked up over 1500 rss subscribers in a day, had over 10,000 unique visitors. My one day on the front page of digg of course crashed my server and then let to about 25,000 unique visitors. In fact my most viewed content on the site is two very niche blog posts my top ten list of star wars t-shirts, and my top ten list of video game t-shirts (and as they are months old and still get about 50% of my traffic they also demonstrate how the long tail works on niches as well).

If it really is only about 50 to 100 people that are passionate about something it’s no wonder that a post titled the 50 most influential bloggers is some of the best linkbate this year… that and the leave brittney alone guy (dugg over 5000 times geez).

Your World Frightens Me, Especially Twitter

What a brilliantly asinine quote from Mark Simon, a VP-industry relations for SEM firm Didit in his article for Ad Age “Ditch the Lunatic Web Content Crazes - Beyond the Hype: The 10 Most Asinine Trends Online and Why You Should Ignore Them

9. TWITTER AND ITS MICROBLOGGING ILK.
What could be more annoying and less useful than a site where thousands of people are given 140 characters to shout out about what they’re doing at every moment of the day? The amazing thing is that enough people out there think this mindless stream of ephemera (”I’m eating a tangerine,” “I’m waiting for a plane,” “I want a Big Mac”) is interesting enough to serve as the basis for a viable advertising platform.

Even more ironic this is under “CMO Strategy”, yep this is exactly the kind of advice you need if you’re a CMO, ignore new things, don’t experiment, don’t participate and your world will be simpler, safer and easier to understand.

Follow me on twitter at twitter.com/karllong where I talk constantly about my need for big macs.

Thanks David, who also has a twitter page where he broke a story about an old woman being rescued from her car that was stuck on the train tracks, yep, another boring day in twitterland

Can Bloggers Save Technorati Meme?

lolcat technorati

Yes I’ve bitched about Technorati, but as with most customer complaints it’s because I care, I want them to do better. Kind of like the report card I used to get at school “karl could do much better if he just applied himself”, I feel the same way about Technorati. After writing my article about Technorati I started coming across others in similar veins, Read/WriteWeb’s was particularly insightful and poignant. Now some people think it’s over and google has won, but I don’t believe the market is that small, and I think there are enough bloggers out there that want and need a service like Technorati, so I thought it appropriate to try and start a meme that goes beyond the usual minutae of 7 random things about you, and focused on what Technorati could do right, and what would you pay for.

A couple of people have raised the $20+ per year pro-account model that Flickr uses, so what would you like to see in a Technorati Pro-Account?

Here are mine:

  • Merging domain names of claimed blogs, I’m sick of having two scores for experiencecurve.com and blog.experiencecurve.com and i’m sure any wordpress and typepad folks would appreciate that one
  • A more meaningful multi-metric “authority” measure, who cares how many linked in the last 6 months, all that measures is link baiting
  • Real blog categorization and vertical blog scoreboards, Boing Boing is not in the same ball park as TechCrunch, or Web-Strategist, or Marketing Profs Daily fix, so lets move on from the top 10K
  • If I have a pro account my blog should get priority indexing :-)
  • Track comments as well as trackbacks
  • Take the lead in establishing engagement metrics
  • Help people build “top ten blog” lists save everyone reinventing it all the time

Those are my suggestions, so if you had a Pro-Technorati account what features would you like to see? If you do respond to this post use the tag “save-technorati”. So i’ll just tag a few instigators and see if this has any legs, how about it David Armano, Joseph Jaffe, Robert Scoble, Hugh MacLeod, Greg Verdino, Danial Rivong, Rohit Bhargava, Mack Collier.

Hey you don’t have to agree either, if you think it’s over for Technorati I’d be interested in that perspective as well, was it a bubble popping or a company that can do better.

UPDATE:

Wither MSM as Blogger Perez Hilton Breaks Castro Dead Story

UPDATE: Perez Hilton’s site is not following up on this story at all which in all likelyhood means it’s not true. Boy, if you can’t trust a gossip blogger who can you trust!

Just heard via twitter that Castro is dead, not only that but Perez Hilton, famed hollywood gossip blogger broke the story. This may be a seminal moment in blogging/social media history.

Thanks Fimoculous

Anonymous Edits To Wikipedia Revealed Through Wikiscanner

I read a great article in the SF Bay Guardian written by Annalee Newitz who blogs at techsploitation.com (awesome name). Anyway, the article is called And the real anonymous trolls online are . . . . In this article she skewers the very un-anonymous troll Andrew Keen, who’s been crying about how the internets is undermining his word view of authority and modernity (maybe he should check out Bioshock). Anyway, this is a rather round about way to talk about a tool called wikiscanner which basically looks up the ip address of any anonymous edits on wikipedia and then looks up what organization owns that ip address. The result, lots of egg on government and corporation faces. With Pepsi editing some of the negative health effects of diet pepsi, to exxon adjusting the size of past oil spills, or wal-mart changing facts about their wages. Some of these edits actually reveal some stewardship of course like Pixar editing the Shrek 4 entry to reflect that it was a Dreamworks Animation and not Pixar.

All of these gems were taken from the Wired reddit list of most salacious wikipedia anonymous edits

If you’re a company that doesn’t have a wikipedia policy get one now.

Relate see my article on uncommon uses for the wiki

5000 Web Applications In 333 Seconds

Great little viral ad created by a company called SimpleSpark, which is an online directory of “web applications”. The video itself is simple, 5000 logos of web applications that they track in their directory, which demonstrates the problem that they are solving immediately. Not only do they track these applications in a directory they also have reviews of the apps and suggestions for other similar apps as well. Not only do they track web applications, but also mobile web apps, iphone web apps, and wii web apps.

Tip of the hat to LaughingSquid

Social Gestures, Objects, and Equity

Hugh over at gapingvoid raises the interesting point that even though the market for companies to create and deliver one way “messages” is dissapearing, demand for PR, marketing, and advertising professionals is growing. The question is now that we don’t control the “message” what are we doing?

To quote Hugh:

1. Problem: Post-Cluetrain Reality- There is no market for “Messages”.

2. Opportunity: There is, however, a VAST market for “Social Gestures”. As Mark Earls says in his brilliant new book, “Herd”, we are, after all, social animals. We are, after all, primates.

3. Execution: Social Objects, Anybody?

I’m going to add number 4:

4. Value: Social Equity, the value you build over time from the creation of and participation with social gestures and social objects.

I’m absolutely convinced that one of the biggest differences between traditional marketing, and new conversational, people driven marketing is you actually build value over time. I think blogs are one of the best examples, every time you post to a blog it’s like making a small deposit in a bank account, each one build on the rest, and ends up returning interest that compounds. The value of a blog over time becomes more than the sum of the individual posts, as it and the author becomes interconnected through other blogs and sites.

Traditional marketing and advertising used to try and build brand equity, in the new conversational marketplace companies that are participating are building social equity (i’m sure that means something else somewhere but it seems appropriate).

What else could you call the value you build over time by participating in the O’Sphere?