<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cool 2.0 Ideas Executed With 1.0 Mindset</title>
	<atom:link href="http://experiencecurve.com/archives/cool-20-ideas-executed-with-10-mindset/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/cool-20-ideas-executed-with-10-mindset</link>
	<description>Learning and writing about emerging internet culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:06:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Link round-up (2/16/07) &#38;laquo; The Field of Action</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/cool-20-ideas-executed-with-10-mindset/comment-page-1#comment-941</link>
		<dc:creator>Link round-up (2/16/07) &#38;laquo; The Field of Action</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Mar 2007 21:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=586#comment-941</guid>
		<description>[...] Cool 2.0 Ideas Executed With 1.0 Mindset &#8220;Great idea? Absolutely. Award winning design? Of Course. Did it test well in front of focus groups? Indupidably. Is it a pain in the ass when you start to try and use it? You bet.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cool 2.0 Ideas Executed With 1.0 Mindset &#38;#8220;Great idea? Absolutely. Award winning design? Of Course. Did it test well in front of focus groups? Indupidably. Is it a pain in the ass when you start to try and use it? You bet.&#38;#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the strategyst &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Development of &#38;#8220;Open&#38;#8221; Product Platforms</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/cool-20-ideas-executed-with-10-mindset/comment-page-1#comment-940</link>
		<dc:creator>the strategyst &#38;#187; Blog Archive &#38;#187; Development of &#38;#8220;Open&#38;#8221; Product Platforms</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Feb 2007 00:45:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=586#comment-940</guid>
		<description>[...] On Monday, Karl Long over at Experience Curve talked about &#8220;2.0 Ideas Executed with a 1.0 Mindset&#8220;. As an example, he cited the new Nike/Apple appliance that converts your iPod into an accelerometer. In a nutshell, he thought that the &#8216;black-boxing&#8217; of the application was a lost opportunity for both companies. Rather than producing a &#8220;polished, monolithic&#8221; product, &#8220;real power could be unleashed with a couple of API’s &#8230; to use [the data] in other ways&#8221;. With this particular example, there is a fine line between providing an open application and addressing security/privacy concerns (recall the University of Washington student that hacked the device, igniting stalker fears). However, clearly (and sensibly) Apple developed the iPod in such a way that it could easily extend its capabilities and functionality &#8212; at this point, they&#8217;ve regrettably chosen not to make the platform &#8220;open&#8221; to external developers. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Monday, Karl Long over at Experience Curve talked about &#38;#8220;2.0 Ideas Executed with a 1.0 Mindset&#38;#8220;. As an example, he cited the new Nike/Apple appliance that converts your iPod into an accelerometer. In a nutshell, he thought that the &#38;#8216;black-boxing&#38;#8217; of the application was a lost opportunity for both companies. Rather than producing a &#38;#8220;polished, monolithic&#38;#8221; product, &#38;#8220;real power could be unleashed with a couple of API’s &#38;#8230; to use [the data] in other ways&#38;#8221;. With this particular example, there is a fine line between providing an open application and addressing security/privacy concerns (recall the University of Washington student that hacked the device, igniting stalker fears). However, clearly (and sensibly) Apple developed the iPod in such a way that it could easily extend its capabilities and functionality &#38;#8212; at this point, they&#38;#8217;ve regrettably chosen not to make the platform &#38;#8220;open&#38;#8221; to external developers. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
