
one must first know the rules to break them
This is a rather hyperbolic statement but Twitter is probably one of the most fascinating emergent communication and collaboration platforms since the advent of writing. Communication and collaboration on twitter is emergent, dynamic, and uniquely colored by the individual’s experience. Rather like writing in Shakespeare’s time where spelling and grammar was a fluid, people are experimenting and learning as they participate more. For this reason I thought I’d provide some examples of how I’m using and experimenting with various conventions that i use to try and communicate more clearly on Twitter in a way that can help both people and machines comprehend while still fitting them in the wonderfully constrained 140 characters.
Slashtags
Slashtags are a simple way to add information to a tweet that helps both people and machines understand context around a tweet. At the end of the content of the tweet you add a / followed by some two and three letter codes that provide the meaning (common slashtag codes are by, via, cc, and re). For example:
Curiosity is the purest form of insubordination /by “Vladimir Nabokov” via @Mandahl @ElspethMurray @valdiskrebs #Writing #poetry
The summary of meaning of the slashtag here is:
- /by – text was originally written by Vladimir Nabokov
- via – I found the tweet by a chain of communication between @Mandahl @ElspethMurray @valdiskrebs
- # – the keywords associated with this tweet are Writing and Poetry
The addition of quotation marks around Vladimir Nabokov’s name is to help any machine readers understand that both words are included in the /by. If this was written as /by Vladimir Nabokov most machines or search engines would interpret this as /by vladimir which is obviously missing some critical context. In the case of twitter names that contain no spaces obviously there is no need for quotation marks as they have no spaces between them. Spaces after the slash are generally separating elements that stand alone, either twitter names, URL’s, or hashtags (the # is known as a hashtag and acts like a keyword or metadata, see twitter fan wiki for more info)
Just one slashtag
It is worth noting that everything following the / should be metadata and therefore it is not necessary to add any more slashes. It’s also worth noting that there is no need to repeat a slashtag either, if you have several people you are cc’ing or found via you can just add as many names after the tag and assume it can be assumed they are part of the preceding slashtag. Here’s an example of an unnecessary slash and via:
@sushobhan: why working & middle class Republicans are like “Turkeys voting for Thanksgiving” http://bit.ly/asInxq /via @dollar5 /via @karllong
This should read (also note I removed the superfluous colon after the twitter username):
@sushobhan why working & middle class Republicans are like “Turkeys voting for Thanksgiving” http://bit.ly/asInxq /via @dollar5 @karllong
by vs via
I often notice people using via when they should really be using by. For me it’s a pretty critical difference if someone wrote an article vs just pointing at it. Here’s an example:
@karllong: the future of the Internet will be driven by reputation http://bit.ly/cHqpeg /by @bhc3 via @contrafactos @innovate
Experimental use, RSVP
I think one of the great things about slashtags is you can really experiment with them and if you do it in a way that a human reader can understand it becomes a way for people to learn and collaborate, creating standards and norms by just usage. Here’s an example where I was invited to a drink up that I was unable to go to, but wanted to promote it to my followers, without giving the impression that I was going to be there. Here’s the experiment:
This is the tweet from Techstars about the drinkup:
@techstars Winter Drinkup this Thursday in San Francisco. RSVP http://bit.ly/cOtRjH /cc @jeffrey @chrismessina @karllong @davemorin @tedr
And my response, using an experimental slashtag of rsvp:
damn, I’ll be out of town
RT @techstars Winter Drinkup this Thursday in San Francisco RSVP http://bit.ly/cOtRjH (expand) /rsvp no cc @chrismessina
This is not going to be interpreted by any machines at this point, but it is human readable so I’m adding some value. Also because it’s not a standard slashtag I made sure to use it as the first / so it would be as obvious as possible what I was intending.
Anyway, those are some examples of how i’m playing with slashtags, I’d love to hear about any emerging communication standards you see emerging on twitter, cheer.
For further reading on slashtags and other Microsyntax, as Stowe Boyd calls it check out these other links:
Microsyntax.org
Adapting twitter to the new RT from webmaster source
Also for further examples of slashtag usage i’ve created some searches on twitter to gather my various usage here:
Karl Long’s use of /via, /cc, /re and /by
{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }
It’s been great watching you explore this and glad you put it all down here.
It’s been a while since I’ve seen good exploration of Twitter grammar, so good to see you putting new energy into the system.
It sounds like you’re attempting to lengthen the visible portion of a tweet, beyond 140 characters, or is this an expansion of The Scobe’s Supertweet idea?
Great ideas, thanks for sharing. I’ll try to start implementing these in my tweets as well.
Matches, this is not supposed to add anything beyond the 140 characters, it’s really just a way to add some metadata to tweets that humans and machines can understand. A couple of companies have added slashtags to their products including the excellent Tweetie 2 on the iphone. The more people that adopt this kind of convention, the more valuable it will become for companies to build services with the standards built in, including twitter.
Nice.
I love to see how we overcome limitations of technology to adapt to our ways. Conversation is rarely in 140 characters and semantic additions to conversation to add value is key for web 3.0. Context and sourcing is oft times the issue in this short form conversation and these help to clarify both.
@feedia
Interesting idea. Personally, I’ve been standardizing on noting authorship (”by”) before the hyperlink, and all sources (”via”) and hashtags after the hyperlink. I feel this physical separation of initial info and its dissemination & tracking data helpful. But your slashtag idea has some merit as well.
Thanks Mark, I think there are many different ways that people are adding meaning to their tweets. I think it’s an interesting exercise especially considering the incredible constraints. BTW not my idea, I’m standing on the shoulders of giants like Chris Messina and Stowe Boyd
See Chris’s article here:
http://factoryjoe.com/blog/2009/11/08/new-microsyntax-for-twitter-three-pointers-and-the-slasher/
and more from Stowe here:
http://www.stoweboyd.com/message/2009/11/11/chris-messinas-new-microsyntax.html
Cheers.
You’re dead right John Anthony, people are incredibly adaptive, it’s amazing what we can do with tools like twitter etc.