<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Engagement vs. Popularity Metrics in Blogs</title>
	<atom:link href="http://experiencecurve.com/archives/engagement-vs-popularity-metrics-in-blogs/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/engagement-vs-popularity-metrics-in-blogs</link>
	<description>Learning and writing about emerging internet culture</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 21:06:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Patung</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/engagement-vs-popularity-metrics-in-blogs/comment-page-1#comment-4398</link>
		<dc:creator>Patung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 17:58:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=981#comment-4398</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve made my own system, for Indonesian blogs, here http://blogs.indonesiamatters.com/

The weakness of it is can&#039;t really measure &#039;engagement&#039;, I&#039;d really like to have some way of counting average number of comments per post, and average number of posts per month as well, and cross-reference current month to past months to try to detect trends, to find when a blog is going &#039;off&#039; and then start decreasing its ranking. I&#039;m currently looking at Postrank for this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve made my own system, for Indonesian blogs, here <a href="http://blogs.indonesiamatters.com/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.indonesiamatters.com/</a></p>
<p>The weakness of it is can&#8217;t really measure &#8216;engagement&#8217;, I&#8217;d really like to have some way of counting average number of comments per post, and average number of posts per month as well, and cross-reference current month to past months to try to detect trends, to find when a blog is going &#8216;off&#8217; and then start decreasing its ranking. I&#8217;m currently looking at Postrank for this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Karl Long</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/engagement-vs-popularity-metrics-in-blogs/comment-page-1#comment-4006</link>
		<dc:creator>Karl Long</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 18:04:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=981#comment-4006</guid>
		<description>Thanks guys, yeah there are some really interesting things going on here, and what kind of posts attract the most comments is always interesting. 

I often find that often if I try and cover all the bases in a post and try and be authoritative I get much less in the way of comments and conversation. Some of it has to come down to voice, some blog posts sound more conversational and more open. Not sure if that comes with practice or some people have a more conversational editorial style. 

@Toby totally agree about Seth, he still has a very high engagement score, but I still find it fascinating that he has an unassailable position from the standpoint of popularity, and this metric is the only one that has moved him from that top spot. I don&#039;t think it means a great deal, but it does indicate that this is a very different metric that is being used here, and I think that&#039;s exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks guys, yeah there are some really interesting things going on here, and what kind of posts attract the most comments is always interesting. </p>
<p>I often find that often if I try and cover all the bases in a post and try and be authoritative I get much less in the way of comments and conversation. Some of it has to come down to voice, some blog posts sound more conversational and more open. Not sure if that comes with practice or some people have a more conversational editorial style. </p>
<p>@Toby totally agree about Seth, he still has a very high engagement score, but I still find it fascinating that he has an unassailable position from the standpoint of popularity, and this metric is the only one that has moved him from that top spot. I don&#8217;t think it means a great deal, but it does indicate that this is a very different metric that is being used here, and I think that&#8217;s exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Toby</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/engagement-vs-popularity-metrics-in-blogs/comment-page-1#comment-4002</link>
		<dc:creator>Toby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 03:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=981#comment-4002</guid>
		<description>Karl - fascinating. many thanks for your time and energies putting this together. it was no simple job! thanks for sharing the results with the community. 

to valeria&#039;s point, i also notice an increase in comments when posts are either more personal or the &#039;information&#039; is wrapped around a story. interesting that although seth does not have comments turned on his engagement score is the 2nd highest ranked.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl &#8211; fascinating. many thanks for your time and energies putting this together. it was no simple job! thanks for sharing the results with the community. </p>
<p>to valeria&#8217;s point, i also notice an increase in comments when posts are either more personal or the &#8216;information&#8217; is wrapped around a story. interesting that although seth does not have comments turned on his engagement score is the 2nd highest ranked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valeria Maltoni</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/engagement-vs-popularity-metrics-in-blogs/comment-page-1#comment-4000</link>
		<dc:creator>Valeria Maltoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 22:32:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=981#comment-4000</guid>
		<description>Karl:

I think you&#039;re onto something with popularity and drop in engagement. We used to have more conversations at my place, now if there are more than a couple of comments it&#039;s a lucky day! However, I noticed that many of the engaging posts were not business proper, they were a bit more personal and off the cuffs. So of course those would get a higher engagement level. But are those posts more useful to individuals? Probably not, I&#039;m not *that* interesting. I&#039;d venture that actionable business information would have greater value. 

And here&#039;s the thing, what if people who get value form it do not link or do not have blogs? What then? How do you measure that? What&#039;s your take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karl:</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re onto something with popularity and drop in engagement. We used to have more conversations at my place, now if there are more than a couple of comments it&#8217;s a lucky day! However, I noticed that many of the engaging posts were not business proper, they were a bit more personal and off the cuffs. So of course those would get a higher engagement level. But are those posts more useful to individuals? Probably not, I&#8217;m not *that* interesting. I&#8217;d venture that actionable business information would have greater value. </p>
<p>And here&#8217;s the thing, what if people who get value form it do not link or do not have blogs? What then? How do you measure that? What&#8217;s your take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie Reece</title>
		<link>http://experiencecurve.com/archives/engagement-vs-popularity-metrics-in-blogs/comment-page-1#comment-3999</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie Reece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Jul 2008 19:50:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://experiencecurve.com/?p=981#comment-3999</guid>
		<description>I also like the attempt to measure engagement rather than popularity. It should be pointed out that Aide RSS only looked at the last 60 days of each blog, so it&#039;s not an overall picture but more like a snapshot. Still, it&#039;s valuable information and something to look forward to implementing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also like the attempt to measure engagement rather than popularity. It should be pointed out that Aide RSS only looked at the last 60 days of each blog, so it&#8217;s not an overall picture but more like a snapshot. Still, it&#8217;s valuable information and something to look forward to implementing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
